Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a score of 87.6, which is much better than the HTC One M9's score of 77.7. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but LG V60 ThinQ has newer 11 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, providing some nice extra features and improved performance. The LG V60 ThinQ body is extremely newer and just a little bit thinner than the HTC One M9's, but it is also much heavier.
The HTC One M9 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional graphics processing unit and a 64-bits processing unit. The HTC One M9 features a better screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a way smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a just a bit greater screen density.
LG V60 ThinQ features a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One M9, because it has a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The LG V60 ThinQ captures clearer videos and photos than HTC One M9, because it has a larger diafragm aperture for better captures in low light situations, a way better video definition, a much better resolution camera and a much bigger sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a way better battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2840mAh.
LG V60 ThinQ costs a lot more than the HTC One M9, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.