Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-03-20 | 2016-03-31 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Blue and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 333.00 | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 554 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is better than LG G5, having a general score of 87.6 against 76.1. The LG V60 ThinQ design is newer than LG G5's, but it is somewhat thicker and heavier. These phones have Android operating system, but the LG V60 ThinQ has an older 11 version while LG G5 has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The LG G5 has a little sharper display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a higher pixel density. The LG V60 ThinQ has a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than LG G5, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more internal storage.
LG V60 ThinQ has a bit better hardware performance than LG G5, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores. The LG V60 ThinQ features a way better battery lifetime than LG G5, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a slightly better camera than LG G5, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality pictures and videos, a much higher resolution back-facing camera and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
LG V60 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.