Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-03-20 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is better than the LG G7 Fit, getting a score of 87.6 against 77. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the LG V60 ThinQ has the previous 11 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. LG V60 ThinQ is a newer cellphone than LG G7 Fit, but it is a lot heavier and thicker.
The LG V60 ThinQ has just a bit better performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4 more processing cores and a higher amount of RAM. The LG G7 Fit has a more vivid screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a higher display density.
LG V60 ThinQ takes a little bit better photographs and videos than LG G7 Fit, because it has a larger camera aperture, a back camera with a much better resolution, a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a lot larger sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality. The LG V60 ThinQ has a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more internal storage capacity.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a much better battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.