Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-03-20 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Blue and White | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is a bit better than LG G7 ThinQ, getting a general score of 87.6 against 81. Both of these phones have Android OS, but LG V60 ThinQ has the older 11 version and LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie. The LG V60 ThinQ construction is newer than LG G7 ThinQ's, although it's heavier and somewhat thicker.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a bit more powerful CPU than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory. LG G7 ThinQ has a more vivid display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a higher count of pixels per inch in the screen.
LG V60 ThinQ features more memory capacity to install games and applications than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much longer battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
LG V60 ThinQ and LG G7 ThinQ both count with quite similar cameras, because although the LG G7 ThinQ has a way smaller sensor, a lot worse (4K) video resolution and a way less megapixels back camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better low light photography and video.
Although LG V60 ThinQ is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG G7 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG G7 ThinQ. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get LG G7 ThinQ, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.