Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Blue and White | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 333.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has a score of 87.6, which is just a bit better than the LG K92's 85.4 global score. Even though the LG V60 ThinQ is better than the LG K92, it must be noted that it is also a a bit thicker and a bit heavier cellphone. Both phones in this review come with Android operating system, but LG V60 ThinQ has a newer 11 version and LG K92 has Android 10 version, giving you some nice extra features.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a bit more powerful processing unit than LG K92, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit better looking screen than LG K92, because it has a little bigger screen, a quite greater screen density and a slightly better 1080 x 2460 resolution.
The LG K92's storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to LG V60 ThinQ's one, they have an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and equal 128 GB internal storage. The LG V60 ThinQ features longer battery performance than LG K92, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The LG K92 shoots better photos and videos than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking worse quality videos and photos, they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same camera aperture and a same resolution back facing camera.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, LG V60 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest one, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.