Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is better than LG V10, with an 87.6 score against 78.6. LG V60 ThinQ's design is notably newer than LG V10's, although it's a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but the LG V60 ThinQ has newer 11 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1 version, giving you a lot of extra features and performance optimizations.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a better performing processor than LG V10, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores. The LG V10 counts with a better screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a greater pixel density.
The LG V10 features a bit better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a much lower video quality, a way smaller sensor providing a much lower image quality and a back camera with a way lower 16 mega-pixels resolution, they both have the same aperture. LG V60 ThinQ has a bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than LG V10, and although they both have a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
LG V60 ThinQ features a much better battery performance than LG V10, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The LG V60 ThinQ is more expensive than LG V10, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.