Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-03-20 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a global score of 87.6, which is a little bit better than LG V30S ThinQ's 82.5 overall score. LG V60 ThinQ is a extremely newer phone than LG V30S ThinQ, although it is somewhat thicker and a lot heavier. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V60 ThinQ has the previous 11 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit faster CPU than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit better looking screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a greater number of pixels per display inch.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a little bit better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing photos and video in low-light situations, it also counts with a much higher resolution back facing camera, a much better video quality and a much larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with as much storage to install applications and games as the LG V60 ThinQ, both of them have the same internal storage and a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much longer battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, LG V60 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest one, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.