Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is slightly better than LG V35 ThinQ, getting a global score of 87.6 against 81.3. LG V60 ThinQ is a newer cellphone than the LG V35 ThinQ, although it is somewhat thicker and notably heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit better display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
LG V60 ThinQ features a quite bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more internal storage capacity. LG V35 ThinQ's processing unit is just as good as the CPU in LG V60 ThinQ, and although the LG V35 ThinQ has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The LG V60 ThinQ captures just a bit better pictures and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing images and video in low light environments, it also counts with a much larger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
LG V60 ThinQ features a very superior battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The LG V60 ThinQ costs more than LG V35 ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.