Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is a bit better than LG Velvet, getting a score of 87.6 against 87.1. Although the LG V60 ThinQ is better than LG Velvet, we must note that it is also a thicker and heavier device. LG V60 ThinQ and LG Velvet have incredibly similar screens, they have the same exact 1080 x 2460 resolution, the same screen pixels density and a screen with the same size.
LG V60 ThinQ has just a little better performance than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. The LG Velvet and LG V60 ThinQ both feature really similar storage for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and equal internal memory capacity.
The LG V60 ThinQ has improved battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4300mAh. The LG Velvet counts with a better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a tinier sensor shooting lower quality videos and images, a much lower (4K) video definition and a way less mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, they both have the same camera aperture.
Although LG V60 ThinQ is a better device, it costs more money than LG Velvet, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG Velvet. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the LG Velvet, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.