Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Blue and White | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing has an overall score of 91.2, which is just a bit better than the LG V60 ThinQ's global score of 87.6. LG Wing is a heavier and somewhat thicker phone than LG V60 ThinQ. Both devices in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the LG Wing has an older 10 version while LG V60 ThinQ has Android 11.
LG Wing counts with a screen that's very similar to the screen in LG V60 ThinQ, both have the same screen density, a display of the same size and exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2460px. The LG V60 ThinQ has a little bit better performance than LG Wing. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
LG Wing takes better videos and photos than LG V60 ThinQ. Both have a 0.59 inches back-facing camera sensor, the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same video frame rate, a same resolution back camera and a F1.8 camera aperture. LG Wing features a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG V60 ThinQ, and although they both have a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Wing also has more internal memory.
The LG V60 ThinQ has longer battery lifetime than LG Wing, because it has a 25% more battery size.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V60 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V60 ThinQ. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy LG V60 ThinQ, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.