Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Microsoft |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Blue and White | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is a little bit better than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, with an 87.6 score against 85.3. These devices include the same Android 11 OS. The LG V60 ThinQ is an older and thicker phone than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, but LG was able to build it lighter anyway. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a little bit better looking display than LG V60 ThinQ, because it has a higher resolution of 1892 x 2688, a quite better display pixels density and a bigger screen.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a CPU that is very similar to the CPU in LG V60 ThinQ, they have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. The LG V60 ThinQ has just a bit better camera than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low light images and videos, it also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher resolution and a way better video resolution.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the LG V60 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a little better battery performance than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has a 12 percent greater battery size.
The LG V60 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.