Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blue and White | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge has a global score of 89.6, which is a bit better than the LG V60 ThinQ's 87.6 overall score. The Motorola edge design is somewhat lighter but a little bit thicker than the LG V60 ThinQ, and both were released only a couple months apart. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola edge has older 10 version and LG V60 ThinQ has Android 11.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola edge, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM. LG V60 ThinQ counts with just a bit better looking display than Motorola edge, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2460 resolution, a little larger display and a little bit higher pixels number per inch in the display.
The Motorola edge has a better camera than LG V60 ThinQ. They have the same camera aperture, a 64 MP camera, the same video frame rates, the same video quality and the same back-facing camera sensor size. The Motorola edge has a bit more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit superior battery performance than Motorola edge, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola edge is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V60 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V60 ThinQ. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the LG V60 ThinQ, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.