Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Blue and White | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro is a bit better than the LG V60 ThinQ, with a general score of 92.8 against 87.6. Motorola Edge 20 Pro is a newer cellphone, and it's also somewhat thinner and lighter than the LG V60 ThinQ. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a newer 12 version and LG V60 ThinQ has Android 11.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a little bit better screen than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a bit lower display density, a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit smaller screen. Motorola Edge 20 Pro features just a little better performance than LG V60 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro takes way better pictures and videos than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ counts with just a bit better battery performance than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because it has an 11 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.