Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Blue and White | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is slightly better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, getting a score of 87.6 against 83.4. The LG V60 ThinQ is an a lot older, just a little bit heavier and a bit thicker cellphone than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but LG V60 ThinQ has older 11 version and Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13 version.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a bit better screen than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little bit less pixels per display inch and a little smaller display. LG V60 ThinQ features a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
LG V60 ThinQ features a very superior storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a very superior camera than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a camera with a much worse 50 MP resolution and a worse video resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit better battery duration than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has a 9 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.