Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Blue and White | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, with an 87.6 score against 81.9. Even though LG V60 ThinQ is a better cellphone than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, we must tell that it is also a lot older, a little bit thicker and way heavier. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V60 ThinQ has an older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a way better looking screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1256 x 2760 and a just a little higher screen density. LG V60 ThinQ features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. They have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM. LG V60 ThinQ counts with longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4310mAh. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a much worse (4K) video definition and a camera with way less megapixels resolution, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.