Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, having a overall score of 87.6 against 86.3. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V60 ThinQ has 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14 version. Despite being the best in this review, it must be told that it is also an extremely older, a bit thicker and heavier cellphone.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a sharper display than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a bit smaller display, a little worse display density and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features slightly more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a back facing camera with a way lower 50 mega pixels resolution and a lot lower 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a way bigger camera aperture.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a little longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.