Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Blue and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, having an 87.6 score against 87.1. These phones include Android OS, but the LG V60 ThinQ has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 version. Despite being the best phone in this comparison, the LG V60 ThinQ construction is notably older, a bit thicker and just a little heavier than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra.
LG V60 ThinQ has a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a better screen than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a bit smaller display and a just a bit lower pixels density.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a superior camera than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a back facing camera with a lot lower 50 mega pixels resolution and a way worse 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better images in poorly lited environments and a way bigger sensor capturing way higher quality videos and photographs.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a slightly better memory for games and applications than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The LG V60 ThinQ features a bit better battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has an 11% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.