Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-03-20 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 333.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a global score of 87.6, which is better than Moto Z Force's 75.8 global score. LG V60 ThinQ is a newer cellphone than Moto Z Force, although it's somewhat thicker and much heavier. These phones work with Android OS, but the LG V60 ThinQ has 11 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a greater number of faster cores and more RAM. Motorola Moto Z Force has a little sharper display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a bit higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a slightly better camera than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same aperture, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera in the back with way more megapixels. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a quite bigger memory to install games and applications than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 64 GB more internal storage.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much better battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh.
LG V60 ThinQ is more expensive than Moto Z Force, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.