Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is better than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, getting a overall score of 87.6 against 76.4. LG V60 ThinQ's body is notably newer, but incredibly heavier and somewhat thicker than Moto Z Force Droid Edition. The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with just a bit better looking display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per display inch.
LG V60 ThinQ features a better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a little faster processor than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores.
LG V60 ThinQ has a really longer battery performance than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh. The LG V60 ThinQ has a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a camera with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution and a lot higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.