Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 333.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has a general score of 87.6, which is better than Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 general score. The LG V60 ThinQ is a extremely newer cellphone than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, although it is incredibly heavier and thicker. The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a little bit better screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels amount in each inch of screen and a little bit higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a better storage capacity for apps and games than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. LG V60 ThinQ features just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 4 GB more RAM.
The LG V60 ThinQ takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a way better video definition, a lot more MP back facing camera, a larger aperture to capture better low light images and a way bigger sensor shooting much higher quality videos and pictures. LG V60 ThinQ has a very superior battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has an 83 percent more battery capacity.
LG V60 ThinQ not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.