Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Blue and White | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a score of 87.6, which is better than the Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 global score. LG V60 ThinQ's construction is newer, but incredibly thicker and notably heavier than the Moto Z2 Play. LG V60 ThinQ features a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG V60 ThinQ features just a bit better looking display than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a quite lower pixel density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a larger screen. The LG V60 ThinQ shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking images and video in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot better video definition and a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution camera.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a greater memory to install applications and games than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much better battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
LG V60 ThinQ costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.