Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-03-20 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Blue and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is better than the Moto Z3, with a global score of 87.6 against 77.6. LG V60 ThinQ's body is newer, but much thicker and much heavier than the Moto Z3. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V60 ThinQ has 11 version while Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Motorola Moto Z3 features a display that's very similar to the LG V60 ThinQ one, because although the Motorola Moto Z3 has a quite smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel quantity per inch in the screen. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a quite bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 64 GB more internal storage.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. LG V60 ThinQ has a very superior battery performance than Moto Z3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The LG V60 ThinQ takes a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a lot better video resolution, a way bigger sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos, a camera with way more mega pixels and a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and video.
The LG V60 ThinQ is a little more expensive than Moto Z3, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.