Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Blue and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is better than Moto Z3 Play, getting an 87.6 score against 76.3. The LG V60 ThinQ construction is newer, but heavier and thicker than the Moto Z3 Play. The LG V60 ThinQ has a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a quite worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a bit bigger display.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a bit better performance than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The LG V60 ThinQ has a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more internal memory.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a very superior battery performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. LG V60 ThinQ has a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking images or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video definition, a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos and a lot more MP back-facing camera.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the LG V60 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.