Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Blue and White | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 333.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has a general score of 87.6, which is better than Motorola One Action's global score of 78.5. LG V60 ThinQ's body is heavier but just a little bit thinner than the Motorola One Action, and both were only released with a few months difference. The Motorola One Action counts with a little more vivid display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater screen pixel density and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2520px.
LG V60 ThinQ has a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ features a bit superior CPU than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a much longer battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The LG V60 ThinQ shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a same size aperture, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a way more megapixels camera and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
LG V60 ThinQ costs a little more money than the Motorola One Action, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.