Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Blue and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 333.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is just a bit better than Motorola One Hyper, having a global score of 87.6 against 79.8. These devices include the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any difference regarding operating system features. The LG V60 ThinQ construction has the same thickness than Motorola One Hyper, but it's a little heavier.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a bit sharper display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit lower display pixels density, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2460. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ has superior battery lifetime than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Motorola One Hyper shoots much better pictures and videos than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for taking images and/or video in low light environments, they both have the same video frame rates, a back camera with a 64 mega-pixels and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The LG V60 ThinQ not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a bit cheaper, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.