Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue and White | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a score of 87.6, which is a little bit better than Motorola One Vision's 80.7 global score. Although LG V60 ThinQ is newer than Motorola One Vision, it is just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The LG V60 ThinQ features just a bit better processing power than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
Motorola One Vision features a little bit better screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater screen density and a slightly better 1080 x 2520 resolution. The Motorola One Vision counts with a much better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a camera in the back with way less megapixels resolution, a tinier sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality and a much worse 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited situations.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ features a much better battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.