Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 333.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a score of 87.6, which is just a bit better than Motorola razr (2020)'s 87 score. Despite being the best in this comparison review, the LG V60 ThinQ is a somewhat thicker and heavier device than Motorola razr (2020). These devices come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a little bit better screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a better 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution, a little more pixels per screen inch and a bit bigger screen. LG V60 ThinQ features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola razr (2020). They have a 8 GB RAM and 8 CPU cores. Motorola razr (2020) captures better photographs and videos than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a lot worse 3840x2160 video quality, a back camera with a lot lower 48 mega-pixels resolution and a smaller sensor shooting worse quality photos and videos, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos and video.
LG V60 ThinQ features a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 79% more battery capacity.
LG V60 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.