Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Blue and White | Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has an overall score of 87.6, which is much better than Nokia 9 PureView's score of 76.4. The LG V60 ThinQ is a newer phone than Nokia 9 PureView, although it's heavier and thicker. The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a little more vivid display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a higher pixels quantity in each inch in the display.
Nokia 9 PureView and LG V60 ThinQ both feature incredibly similar processing units, and although the Nokia 9 PureView has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much better storage to install games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V60 ThinQ takes a little bit better videos and photos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a lot larger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a back facing camera with a much better 64 MP resolution.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a much better battery life than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3320mAh.
The LG V60 ThinQ not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.