Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Blue and White | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, with an 87.6 score against 83.1. The LG V60 ThinQ construction has the same thickness than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, but it is just a little bit heavier. These phones have Android OS, but the LG V60 ThinQ has a more recent 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10 version, so it offers a lot of extra features and some performance improvements.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit faster CPU than LG V60 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much better screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 and a better pixels count per inch of display.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a camera with much less mega-pixels resolution and a lot worse 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality photos and videos and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images and video.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a little bit better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage. LG V60 ThinQ has longer battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 17 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.