Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is much better than Samsung Galaxy A30, having a general score of 87.6 against 79.6. Although the LG V60 ThinQ is newer than the Samsung Galaxy A30, it is heavier and thicker. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
LG V60 ThinQ features a slightly better display than Galaxy A30, because although it has a quite worse screen density, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a quite bigger display. The LG V60 ThinQ shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A30, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photos, it also counts with a camera with a much better 64 MP resolution, a way larger back-facing camera sensor and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A30, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with better battery duration than Galaxy A30, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.