Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Blue and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is a bit better than Galaxy A31, with an 87.6 score against 81.3. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the LG V60 ThinQ has the newer 11 version and Galaxy A31 has Android 10. Even being the best device we are comparing here, LG V60 ThinQ's design is a bit thicker and heavier than the Galaxy A31.
Galaxy A31 features a display that's very similar to LG V60 ThinQ's screen, because although the Galaxy A31 has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little better count of pixels in each inch of display. The LG V60 ThinQ has a bit better processor than Galaxy A31, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM.
LG V60 ThinQ features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A31, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A31 has a battery lifetime that's just as good as LG V60 ThinQ's battery duration.
Samsung Galaxy A31 features a little bit better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a smaller sensor capturing worse quality images and videos, a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light captures and videos, a much lower 1920x1080 video quality and a way worse 48 megapixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.