Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-20 | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is better than Galaxy A40, getting an 87.6 score against 79.6. These devices have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding OS features. LG V60 ThinQ's construction is newer than the Galaxy A40's, although it's notably heavier and somewhat thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy A40 has a slightly better display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel density. LG V60 ThinQ features a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A40, because it has more internal storage and a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A40, because it has a 61% more battery capacity.
The LG V60 ThinQ shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A40, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a way more MP back-facing camera and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.