Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Blue and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A41, having an 87.6 score against 81.7. Both phones we compare here work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system). The LG V60 ThinQ is a noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A41. Galaxy A41 counts with a slightly better looking display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of display.
The LG V60 ThinQ features much more memory for games and applications than Galaxy A41, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ has a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy A41 has a slightly better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a lot worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a way less megapixels back camera, a smaller aperture and a tinier back-facing camera sensor giving a lower image quality. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.