Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is much better than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), getting a score of 87.6 against 75.8. Although the LG V60 ThinQ is a lot newer than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), it's notably heavier and thicker. LG V60 ThinQ has a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A5 (2017) has a display that's very similar to the display in LG V60 ThinQ, because although the Galaxy A5 (2017) has a really smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater display pixels density. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3000mAh. LG V60 ThinQ has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a back-facing camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a larger aperture to take better photography and video in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.