Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is slightly better than the Galaxy A50, getting an 87.6 score against 83.8. LG V60 ThinQ's design is newer, but noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker than Galaxy A50. LG V60 ThinQ has a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy A50 counts with a display that's very similar to the screen in LG V60 ThinQ, because although the Galaxy A50 has a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher display pixel density. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy A50, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V60 ThinQ takes clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a camera with lot more mega-pixels, a lot higher video definition and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality pictures. LG V60 ThinQ features superior battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Although LG V60 ThinQ is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A50. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy LG V60 ThinQ, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A50, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.