Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-20 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue and White | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A50s, getting a overall score of 87.6 against 86.6. Although it's the best phone in this comparison, the LG V60 ThinQ is a somewhat thicker and a lot heavier phone than Samsung Galaxy A50s. These phones work with Android OS, but LG V60 ThinQ has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A50s has Android 10 version.
LG V60 ThinQ features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A50s has a display that is just as good as the LG V60 ThinQ one, because although the Samsung Galaxy A50s has a bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a bit better quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen.
LG V60 ThinQ features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ counts with better battery life than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 25% more battery capacity.
Galaxy A50s shoots much better videos and photos than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a way lower video quality, a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and video in poorly lited environments, a back camera with a lot worse 48 mega pixels resolution and a smaller sensor giving a worse image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.