Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Blue and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is slightly better than Galaxy A51, getting a score of 87.6 against 85.5. These devices have the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding that. Despite being the best cellphone we are comparing, it must be told that it's also a way heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone.
Galaxy A51 and LG V60 ThinQ both have really similar displays, because although the Galaxy A51 has a little lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher count of pixels per inch of screen. The LG V60 ThinQ features a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG V60 ThinQ features a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy A51 counts with a better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a smaller camera sensor taking less light and washed colors, a way worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a much less mega-pixels camera in the back and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video.
The LG V60 ThinQ features improved battery performance than Galaxy A51, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG V60 ThinQ is a better device, it is more expensive than Galaxy A51, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A51. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the LG V60 ThinQ, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy A51, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.