Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is just a bit better than the LG V60 ThinQ, getting a global score of 90.7 against 87.6. Samsung Galaxy A52 is a newer cellphone, and it is also a little thinner and somewhat lighter than the LG V60 ThinQ. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy A52 counts with a display that is very similar to the LG V60 ThinQ one, because although the Galaxy A52 has a little smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bit greater pixel quantity per display inch. Galaxy A52 has a better camera than LG V60 ThinQ. Both have the same diafragm aperture, a same size camera sensor, the same video frame rates, a 64 megapixels resolution camera and the same video quality.
LG V60 ThinQ features a quite bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG V60 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ features just a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.