Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is slightly better than LG V60 ThinQ, having a general score of 91.3 against 87.6. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version while LG V60 ThinQ has Android 11, so it provides a lot of extra features. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's construction is newer, lighter and a little thinner than LG V60 ThinQ.
The LG V60 ThinQ and the Galaxy A52 5G have really similar displays, because although the Galaxy A52 5G has a bit smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the display. LG V60 ThinQ features a bit better CPU than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a superior camera than LG V60 ThinQ. Both have the same video frame rate, a F1.8 diafragm aperture, a same resolution back-facing camera, the same video definition and a 0.59 inches back camera sensor. The LG V60 ThinQ features a greater memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.