Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue and White | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a bit better than the LG V60 ThinQ, with a 91.1 score against 87.6. The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a newer cellphone, and it is also a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the LG V60 ThinQ. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 OS. LG V60 ThinQ has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy A52s has a display that is just as good as the LG V60 ThinQ one, because although the Galaxy A52s has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better screen density. The Galaxy A52s captures better pictures and videos than LG V60 ThinQ. Both have a same resolution back facing camera, the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a same size camera aperture and a 0.59 inches sensor.
LG V60 ThinQ has a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A52s, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ features a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.