Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a general score of 87.6, which is much better than the Galaxy A6's 75.8 score. Even though LG V60 ThinQ is newer than Galaxy A6, it is way heavier and somewhat thicker. LG V60 ThinQ features a superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
LG V60 ThinQ features a sharper display than Galaxy A6, because it has a higher screen density, a bigger display and a much higher 1080 x 2460px resolution. The LG V60 ThinQ has a way bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The LG V60 ThinQ captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a lot better resolution camera, a lot larger sensor and a lot better video resolution.
Although LG V60 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy A6. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the LG V60 ThinQ, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Samsung Galaxy A6, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.