Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-20 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is much better than Samsung Galaxy A70, getting a global score of 87.6 against 76.9. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS, but the LG V60 ThinQ has the newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, giving a lot of extra features. Although LG V60 ThinQ is newer than Samsung Galaxy A70, it's thicker and heavier.
LG V60 ThinQ features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. The LG V60 ThinQ has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A70, because it has a little larger screen, a bit higher 1080 x 2460px resolution and a bit better pixel amount per screen inch.
LG V60 ThinQ has much more memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ counts with just a bit better battery life than Galaxy A70, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
LG V60 ThinQ shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way higher video resolution and a much bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The LG V60 ThinQ is a little more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A70, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.