Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Blue and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A71, with an 87.6 score against 87.5. These phones have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should provide you identical OS features. Even though LG V60 ThinQ is a better cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A71, we must tell that it's also somewhat thicker and heavier.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a little better processing power than Galaxy A71, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. The LG V60 ThinQ features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A71, because it has a just a bit better pixels density, a bit bigger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A71 captures much better photographs and videos than LG V60 ThinQ. They have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same back-facing camera sensor size, a same size aperture and a 64 MP camera in the back. LG V60 ThinQ features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A71, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V60 ThinQ has a little better battery performance than Galaxy A71, because it has an 11% bigger battery size.
The LG V60 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.