Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blue and White | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a global score of 92.9, which is a little bit better than the LG V60 ThinQ's global score of 87.6. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has the previous 10 version and LG V60 ThinQ has Android 11. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's design is a bit thinner and lighter than LG V60 ThinQ, even when both were only released 4 months apart.
LG V60 ThinQ and Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW both have really similar screens, although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little worse screen pixel density, a bit smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2400px resolution. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW. Both have a 8 GB RAM and the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots much clearer pictures and videos than LG V60 ThinQ. They have the same video frame rates, a camera with a 64 MP, the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same back-facing camera sensor size and the same aperture.
LG V60 ThinQ has just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V60 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V60 ThinQ. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the LG V60 ThinQ, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.