Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2018-01-06 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has an overall score of 87.6, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018)'s global score of 79.2. LG V60 ThinQ's construction is newer, but much heavier and just a bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018). The LG V60 ThinQ has a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) counts with just a bit better display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2220 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater display density. LG V60 ThinQ features a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG V60 ThinQ has a really longer battery duration than Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a 5000mAh battery size. LG V60 ThinQ shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and video, it also counts with a way more megapixels back facing camera and a way higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.