Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and White | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), having an 87.6 score against 85.2. Even though the LG V60 ThinQ is newer than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), it's thicker and somewhat heavier. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a quite larger display, a little better display pixels density and a slightly better 1080 x 2460px resolution.
LG V60 ThinQ has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. LG V60 ThinQ features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) shoots a little bit better photos and videos than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a much smaller back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot lower image and video quality, a much lower video resolution and a back-facing camera with a lot worse 24 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better low light photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.