Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Blue and White | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is slightly better than LG V60 ThinQ's 87.6 overall score. Samsung Galaxy F62 is a newer and a little lighter phone than LG V60 ThinQ, although it's also just a little bit thicker. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
The LG V60 ThinQ has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy F62, because it has more RAM and a higher number of cores. Galaxy F62 has a bit better looking screen than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a quite smaller display, a just a little less pixels per inch of display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a quite bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy F62 features a much better battery lifetime than LG V60 ThinQ, because it has a 7000mAh battery size. The Samsung Galaxy F62 takes much better photographs and videos than LG V60 ThinQ. Both have the same sensor size, the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same aperture and the same resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.