Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-20 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Blue and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 333.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is better than LG V60 ThinQ, with a 97.6 score against 87.6. Even though the Galaxy Fold and LG V60 ThinQ were released with only 6 months difference, Galaxy Fold's design is much thinner but also noticeably heavier. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version while LG V60 ThinQ has Android 11.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a bit better CPU than LG V60 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM. The LG V60 ThinQ has a little more vivid display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater pixels density.
LG V60 ThinQ shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a lot more megapixels back-facing camera, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a way larger sensor taking much higher quality pictures and videos.
The Galaxy Fold has a bit more memory capacity to store more games and applications than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The LG V60 ThinQ features a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4380mAh.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V60 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V60 ThinQ. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy Fold, otherwise you can save some money and get the LG V60 ThinQ, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.