Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-03-20 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Blue and White | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is much better than Galaxy M20, getting an 87.6 score against 78.9. LG V60 ThinQ's body has the same thickness than Galaxy M20, but it's somewhat heavier. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V60 ThinQ has newer 11 version and Galaxy M20 has Android 10, so it gives a lot of extra features and some performance improvements.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy M20, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. LG V60 ThinQ features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a bit worse number of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution.
The LG V60 ThinQ takes much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a much better 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a lot larger camera sensor. The LG V60 ThinQ has a much better memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy M20 has a battery performance that is very similar to the battery duration in LG V60 ThinQ.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.