Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-03-20 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has a global score of 87.6, which is slightly better than Galaxy M30's 82.4 global score. Although the LG V60 ThinQ is newer than the Galaxy M30, it's just a little bit thicker and noticeably heavier. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V60 ThinQ has 11 version while Galaxy M30 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a little better performance than Galaxy M30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM. LG V60 ThinQ has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a little greater pixels density, a little larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels.
LG V60 ThinQ takes better photographs and videos than Galaxy M30, because it has a lot better video resolution, a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and video, a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way higher resolution back facing camera. LG V60 ThinQ has a much better memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M30, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy M30 features a battery lifetime that's just as good as LG V60 ThinQ's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.